In re Beck

Supreme Court of New Jersey

In re Beck

600 A.2d 1210, 126 N.J. 514, 1992 N.J. LEXIS 1467

DecidedJanuary 30, 1992

StatusPublished

This text of 600 A.2d 1210 (In re Beck) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Beck, 600 A.2d 1210, 126 N.J. 514, 1992 N.J. LEXIS 1467 (N.J. 1992).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

The reinstatement to the practice of law of BASIL D. BECK, JR., of BRIDGETON having been conditioned on his continued employment with the firm of Yasser, Spitalniek, Bloom & Mazin, as set forth in this Court’s Order of December 13, 1991,

And the association of said BASIL D. BECK, JR., with the firm of Vasser, Spitalniek, Bloom & Mazin having been terminated, effective January 28, 1992,

And good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that BASIL D. BECK, JR., is suspended from the practice of law, effective January 28, 1992, and until the further Order of the Court; and it is further

ORDERED that pursuant to Rule 1:20-12, Joseph W. Veight, III, Esquire, and Theresa Christian-Hunsberger, Esquire, are designated trustees of the practice of said Basil D. Beck, Jr., effective immediately and until further Order of the Court and, in that capacity, shall see to the notification of clients and the distribution of open files as soon as may be practicable.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI