In re Beck
This text of 247 Ga. 461 (In re Beck) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Respondent, on a formal complaint for disbarment, was charged with violating State Bar Rule 4-102 Standard 66 in that he was sentenced on a nolo contendere plea in U. S. District Court, Northern District of Georgia, to a criminal indictment alleging violation of 18 USCA 1006 and 1014 during February and March, 1975. The Special Master dismissed the disbarment proceedings for failure to state a claim. The State Bar Disciplinary Board remanded the case to the Special Master for additional evidence. Thereafter respondent petitioned for voluntary discipline of reprimand. The Special Master recommended a private reprimand. The State Bar Disciplinary Board recommends a public reprimand. After a review of the record, the State Bar Disciplinary Board’s recommendation is approved and a public reprimand is ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
247 Ga. 461, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-beck-ga-1981.