In re Beck

247 Ga. 461
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided April 9, 1981·No. Supreme Court Disciplinary No. 90·Published

Opinion

Per curiam.

Respondent, on a formal complaint for disbarment, was charged with violating State Bar Rule 4-102 Standard 66 in that he was sentenced on a nolo contendere plea in U. S. District Court, Northern District of Georgia, to a criminal indictment alleging violation of 18 USCA 1006 and 1014 during February and March, 1975. The Special Master dismissed the disbarment proceedings for failure to state a claim. The State Bar Disciplinary Board remanded the case to the Special Master for additional evidence. Thereafter respondent petitioned for voluntary discipline of reprimand. The Special Master recommended a private reprimand. The State Bar Disciplinary Board recommends a public reprimand. After a review of the record, the State Bar Disciplinary Board’s recommendation is approved and a public reprimand is ordered.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Beck, 247 Ga. 461 (Ga. 1981).

247 Ga. 461 (In re Beck) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.