In re Beaver

Fourth Circuit

In re Beaver

272 F. App'x 248

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 4, 2008·No. No. 08-1062·Published

Opinion

Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Justin Clay Beaver petitions for writ of mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. The district court dismissed Beaver’s § 2254 petition by order entered October 9, 2007. Therefore, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny the mandamus petition as moot. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Justin Clay Beaver petitions for writ of mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. The district court dismissed Beaver’s § 2254 petition by order entered October 9, 2007. Therefore, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny the mandamus petition as moot. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED.

In re Beaver, 272 F. App'x 248 (4th Cir. 2008).

Pincite

272 F. App'x 248 (In re Beaver) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related