in Re Beatrice Zarate
This text of in Re Beatrice Zarate (in Re Beatrice Zarate) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed August 20, 2015.
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals
NO. 14-15-00683-CV
IN RE BEATRICE ZARATE, Relator
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING WRIT OF MANDAMUS County Civil Court at Law No. 2 Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 974,424-101
MEMORANDUM OPINION
On August 11, 2015, relator Beatrice Zarate filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this court. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221 (West 2004); see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. In the petition, relator asks this court to compel the Honorable Theresa Chang, presiding judge of County Civil Court at Law No. 2 of Harris County, to set aside her March 4, 2015 order granting real party interest’s motion in limine and direct the trial court to permit relator to present evidence on claims and affirmative defenses dismissed on summary judgment.
Relator has not established that she is entitled to mandamus relief. Accordingly, we deny relator’s petition for writ of mandamus.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Jamison, McCally, and Wise.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re Beatrice Zarate, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-beatrice-zarate-texapp-2015.