In Re: Beatrice B. Davis Family Heritage Tr.

Nevada Supreme Court

In Re: Beatrice B. Davis Family Heritage Tr.

DecidedJuly 16, 2020

Docket79080

StatusPublished

This text of In Re: Beatrice B. Davis Family Heritage Tr. (In Re: Beatrice B. Davis Family Heritage Tr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In Re: Beatrice B. Davis Family Heritage Tr., (Neb. 2020).

Pincite

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

IN THE MATTER OF THE BEATRICE No. 79080 B. DAVIS FAMILY HERITAGE TRUST, DATED JULY 28, 2000, AS AMENDED ON FEBRUARY 24, 2014. FILE CHRISTOPHER D. DAVIS, JUL 16 2020 Appellant, vs. CAROLINE DAVIS; AND DUNHAM TRUST COMPANY, Res ondents.

ORDER OF AFFIRMANCE This is a pro se appeal from a district court order resolving a petition for instructions in the administration of a trust. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Gloria Sturman, Judge.1 Having considered the parties arguments and the record, we are not persuaded that the district court committed reversible error in ordering the liquidation of the trust assets. Although appellant seeks a distribution of trust assets, the district court's April 26, 2019, order contemplates such a distribution in the future, and we are not persuaded that our intervention at this time is warranted. Accordingly, we ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED.

/eksbC4.-0 , J. J. Stiglich Silver

1Pursuant to NRAP 34(f)(3), we have determined that oral argument is not warranted in this appeal.

SO-DA 11-- cc: Hon. Gloria Sturman, District Judge Christopher D. Davis Caroline Davis Lee, Landrum & Carlson, APC Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 2 (0) I 947A '40..

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

IN THE MATTER OF THE BEATRICE No. 79080 B. DAVIS FAMILY HERITAGE TRUST, DATED JULY 28, 2000, AS AMENDED ON FEBRUARY 24, 2014. FILE CHRISTOPHER D. DAVIS, JUL 16 2020 Appellant, vs. CAROLINE DAVIS; AND DUNHAM TRUST COMPANY, Res ondents.

ORDER OF AFFIRMANCE This is a pro se appeal from a district court order resolving a petition for instructions in the administration of a trust. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Gloria Sturman, Judge.1 Having considered the parties arguments and the record, we are not persuaded that the district court committed reversible error in ordering the liquidation of the trust assets. Although appellant seeks a distribution of trust assets, the district court's April 26, 2019, order contemplates such a distribution in the future, and we are not persuaded that our intervention at this time is warranted. Accordingly, we ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED.

/eksbC4.-0 , J. J. Stiglich Silver

1Pursuant to NRAP 34(f)(3), we have determined that oral argument is not warranted in this appeal.

SO-DA 11-- cc: Hon. Gloria Sturman, District Judge Christopher D. Davis Caroline Davis Lee, Landrum & Carlson, APC Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 2 (0) I 947A '40..

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

In Re: Beatrice B. Davis Family Heritage Tr., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-beatrice-b-davis-family-heritage-tr-nev-2020.