In Re Beane
This text of 35 A.3d 1136 (In Re Beane) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District of Columbia Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
On consideration of Bar Counsel’s report regarding petitioner’s petition for reinstatement, the petition for reinstatement, and it appearing that petitioner filed his D.C. Bar R. XI, § 14(g) affidavit on December 20, 2010 and therefore is eligible to file the petition for reinstatement, it is
ORDERED that petitioner’s petition for reinstatement is granted; however, reinstatement is subject to the following conditions, which we add pursuant to our authority under D.C. Bar R. XI, § 16(f): (1) petitioner must, every six months for a period of three years, file a written report with Bar Counsel that specifies his (a) efforts during that period toward full repayment of the $29, 935.00 to the Client Security Fund, (b) both the nature of any work he has performed and the continuing legal education he has undertaken during the period, and (c)whether he has personally taken on new clients (as opposed to performing legal work for other attorneys), and if so, the system set up to segregate client funds and the system set up to assure adequate communication with clients. Additionally, petitioner, must consult with the District of Columbia Bar’s Practice Management Advisory Service prior to reentry into private practice. Petitioner shall execute any necessary waivers of confidentiality required for Bar Counsel to obtain information on petitioner’s compliance with the repayment condition. It is
FURTHER ORDERED that James W. Beane, Jr., Esquire is hereby reinstated to the Bar of the District of Columbia subject to the conditions outlined above. Failure to fully comply with the above conditions and to fully repay the Client Security Fund within three years may result in revocation of this reinstatement order. See D.C. Bar R. XI, § 16(f).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
35 A.3d 1136, 2011 WL 7092665, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-beane-dc-2012.