in Re BDPJ Houston, LLC
This text of in Re BDPJ Houston, LLC (in Re BDPJ Houston, LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Motion Granted and Order filed September 24, 2013.
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals ____________
NO. 14-13-00751-CV ____________
IN RE BDPJ HOUSTON, LLC, Relator
On Appeal from the 133rd District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2010-54130
ORDER
On August 27, 2013, relator BDPJ Houston, LLC filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this court. See Tex. Gov’t Code § 22.221. Relator asks this court to order the Honorable Jaclanel McFarland, judge of the 133rd District Court of Harris County, to set aside her order dated August 19, 2013, entered in trial court cause number 2010-54130, styled Water Rescue, Inc. v. Central Management, Inc. and BDPJ Houston, LLC. Relator asserts respondent abused her discretion by compelling the production of documents evidencing the amount, location, and expenditure of confidential settlement funds. Relator also has filed a motion for a temporary stay of the proceedings below. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(b), 52.10. On August 27, 2013, relator asked this court to stay the trial court’s order compelling production pending a decision on the petition for writ of mandamus.
It appears from the facts stated in the petition and motion that relator’s request for relief requires further consideration and that relator will be prejudiced unless immediate temporary relief is granted. We therefore GRANT relator’s motion and issue the following order:
We ORDER the trial court’s August 19, 2013 order compelling production in trial court cause number 2010-54130, styled Water Rescue, Inc. v. Central Management, Inc. and BDPJ Houston, LLC., STAYED until a final decision by this court on relator’s petition for writ of mandamus, or until further order of this court.
In addition, the court requests Central Management, Inc., the real party in interest, to file a response to the petition for writ of mandamus on or before October 8, 2013. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.4.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Frost, Busby, and Donovan.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re BDPJ Houston, LLC, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-bdpj-houston-llc-texapp-2013.