In re: B.C. and O.C.
This text of In re: B.C. and O.C. (In re: B.C. and O.C.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-XX-XXXXXXX 26-FEB-2026 12:27 PM Dkt. 29 ODAC
SCWC-XX-XXXXXXX
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAIʻI ________________________________________________________________
IN THE INTEREST OF B.C. and O.C. (CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX; FC-S NO. 21-00076)
-------------------------------------------------
IN THE INTEREST OF S.C. (CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX; FC-S NO. 21-00165) ________________________________________________________________
CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS
ORDER REJECTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: McKenna, Acting C.J., Eddins, Ginoza, and Devens JJ., and Circuit Judge Jackson, assigned by reason of vacancy)
The amended application for writ of certiorari filed
on January 5, 2026, by Mother-Petitioner, is hereby rejected.
DATED: Honolulu, Hawaiʻi, February 26, 2026.
/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna /s/ Todd W. Eddins /s/ Lisa M. Ginoza /s/ Vladimir P. Devens /s/ Kauanoe A.D. Jackson
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
In re: B.C. and O.C., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-bc-and-oc-haw-2026.