In re Baylor Medical Center at Waxahachie
134 S.W.3d 359, 2003 Tex. App. LEXIS 10483, 2003 WL 22937327
Opinion
OPINION
Respondent, Judge Gene Knize, did not have the benefit of the Supreme Court’s ruling in Walker v. Gutierrez, 111 S.W.3d 56 (Tex.2003), when he ruled. We deny the petition for mandamus, without prejudice, to allow him to reconsider his ruling. See In re de la Garza, 92 S.W.3d 416 (Tex.2001) (orig. proceeding) (per curiam); In re Van Waters & Rogers Inc., 988 S.W.2d 740 (Tex.1998) (orig.proceeding) (per curiam).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In re Baylor Medical Center at Waxahachie, 134 S.W.3d 359, 2003 Tex. App. LEXIS 10483, 2003 WL 22937327 (Tex. Ct. App. 2003).
134 S.W.3d 359 (In re Baylor Medical Center at Waxahachie) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
North Silo Resources, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company v. Kirstin J. Deselms Singletree Land, LLC, a Wyoming limited liability company Hugh Deselms Paul A. Woods Cheryl S. Woods Shelli R. Woods Cody S. Woods Charlotte Joan Hutton Hutton Family Partnership Mike Hutton and Hutton Minerals, LLC, a Wyoming limited liability company
2022 WY 116 (Wyoming Supreme Court, 2022)
In re Stanford
573 B.R. 205 (W.D. Texas, 2017)
in Re Ford Motor Company
Court of Appeals of Texas, 2009