In re Bayer
This text of 6 A.D.2d 867 (In re Bayer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgments unanimously affirmed, without costs. No opinion. While it is clear that the two boys involved in these appeals were offenders only because of a single accidental circumstance and not because of any pattern of conduct, the determinations of the court below are supported in law and fact. Concur — Breitel, J. P., M. M. Frank, Valente, McNally and Bergan, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
6 A.D.2d 867, 176 N.Y.S.2d 928, 1958 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5211, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-bayer-nyappdiv-1958.