in Re: Bay Ltd.
This text of in Re: Bay Ltd. (in Re: Bay Ltd.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NUMBER 13-09-00326-CV
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
IN RE BAY LTD.
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus and Motion for Emergency Stay.
MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Yañez and Benavides Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam1
Relator, Bay Ltd., filed a petition for writ of mandamus and motion for emergency
stay in the above cause on June 12, 2009. The Court requested and received responses
to the motion for emergency stay and the petition for writ of mandamus from the real
parties in interest.
The Court, having examined and fully considered the petition for writ of mandamus
and motion for emergency stay, the responses thereto, and the reply brief filed by relator,
is of the opinion that relator has not shown itself entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly,
1 See T EX . R . A PP . P . 5 2 .8 (d ) (“W hen denying relief, the court m ay hand dow n an opinio n but is not required to do so.”); T EX . R . A PP . P . 47.4 (distinguishing opinions and m em orandum opinions). the motion for emergency stay and the petition for writ of mandamus are DENIED. See
TEX . R. APP. P. 52.8(a).
PER CURIAM Memorandum Opinion delivered and filed this 9th day of July, 2009.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re: Bay Ltd., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-bay-ltd-texapp-2009.