in Re: Bay Area Dialysis Sinton

• Court: Court of Appeals of Texas
• Decided: July 27, 2007
• Docket: 13-07-00475-CV
• Status: Published

Opinion

NUMBER 13-07-475-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

---

IN RE BAY AREA DIALYSIS SINTON, ET AL.

---

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus

---

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Benavides and Vela

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam ⁽¹⁾

Relators, Bay Area Dialysis Sinton, et al., have filed a petition for writ of mandamus in the above cause asking this Court to direct the Honorable John B. Martinez, presiding judge of the County Court at Law No. 3 of Nueces County, Texas to reconsider a ruling regarding the admissibility of an alleged privileged document during an ongoing trial. Relators have also filed a motion for emergency relief. A response has been filed by real party in interest, Billie Durnan.

The Court, having examined and fully considered the petition for writ of mandamus, is of the opinion that relators have not shown themselves entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus and the motion for emergency relief are hereby DENIED. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a).

PER CURIAM

Memorandum opinion delivered and filed

this 27^th day of July, 2007.

1.

See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(d) ("When denying relief, the court may hand down an opinion but is not required to do so."); Tex. R. App. P. 47.4 (distinguishing opinions and memorandum opinions).