In Re: Baxter Planning Systems Opco, LLC and Baxter Planning Systems, LLC v. the State of Texas

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedMarch 29, 2024
Docket05-23-01107-CV
StatusPublished

This text of In Re: Baxter Planning Systems Opco, LLC and Baxter Planning Systems, LLC v. the State of Texas (In Re: Baxter Planning Systems Opco, LLC and Baxter Planning Systems, LLC v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In Re: Baxter Planning Systems Opco, LLC and Baxter Planning Systems, LLC v. the State of Texas, (Tex. Ct. App. 2024).

Opinion

Denied and Opinion Filed March 29, 2024

S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-23-01107-CV

IN RE BAXTER PLANNING SYSTEMS OPCO, LLC AND BAXTER PLANNING SYSTEMS, LLC, Relators

Original Proceeding from the County Court at Law No. 3 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC-22-05770-C

MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Partida-Kipness, Carlyle, and Garcia Opinion by Justice Partida-Kipness In this original proceeding, relators Baxter Planning Systems Opco, LLC and

Baxter Planning Systems, LLC seek mandamus relief from the trial court’s denial of

their motion to dismiss based on a contractual forum-selection clause. Relators have

also filed an emergency motion seeking a stay of the underlying proceedings pending

resolution of this original proceeding.

Entitlement to mandamus relief requires relators to show that the trial court

clearly abused its discretion and that they lack an adequate appellate remedy. In re

Prudential Ins. Co. of Am., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135–36 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding). After reviewing the petition and the record before us, we conclude that relators have

not demonstrated that the trial court abused its discretion.

Accordingly, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus. See TEX. R. APP. P.

52.8(a). Having denied the petition, we also deny as moot relators’ stay motion.

/Robbie Partida-Kipness/ ROBBIE PARTIDA-KIPNESS JUSTICE 231107F.P05

–2–

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re Prudential Insurance Co. of America
148 S.W.3d 124 (Texas Supreme Court, 2004)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
In Re: Baxter Planning Systems Opco, LLC and Baxter Planning Systems, LLC v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-baxter-planning-systems-opco-llc-and-baxter-planning-systems-llc-texapp-2024.