In re Bauer

Illinois Supreme Court

In re Bauer

221 Ill. 2d 679

CourtIllinois Supreme Court

DecidedSeptember 15, 2006

DocketMR 21102

StatusPublished

This text of 221 Ill. 2d 679 (In re Bauer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Illinois Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Bauer, 221 Ill. 2d 679 (Ill. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

Order of the Court:

The petition by the Administrator of the Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission to impose discipline on consent pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 762(b) is allowed, and respondent Michael Bauer is suspended from the practice of law for nine months. Suspension effective October 12, 2006. Respondent Michael Bauer shall reimburse the Client Protection Program Trust Fund for any Client Protection payments arising from his conduct prior to the termination of the period of suspension.

Fitzgerald and Burke, JJ., took no part.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order of the Court:

The petition by the Administrator of the Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission to impose discipline on consent pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 762(b) is allowed, and respondent Michael Bauer is suspended from the practice of law for nine months. Suspension effective October 12, 2006. Respondent Michael Bauer shall reimburse the Client Protection Program Trust Fund for any Client Protection payments arising from his conduct prior to the termination of the period of suspension.

Fitzgerald and Burke, JJ., took no part.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

221 Ill. 2d 679, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-bauer-ill-2006.