In Re Bates
This text of 26 So. 3d 746 (In Re Bates) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS
The Office of Disciplinary Counsel (“ODC”) commenced an investigation into allegations of professional misconduct by respondent, including violations of Rules 8.4(a), 8.4(b), and 8.4(c) of the Rules of Professional Conduct stemming from his criminal conviction of two counts of health care fraud and two counts of paying illegal *747 remuneration to Medicare beneficiaries. Prior to the filing of formal charges, respondent and the ODC submitted a joint petition for consent discipline. The parties stipulate to respondent’s misconduct, and seek his permanent disbarment from the practice of law.
Based on our review of the petition, we agree that permanent disbarment is the appropriate sanction under Guideline 6 (insurance fraud) of the permanent disbarment guidelines set forth in Supreme Court Rule XIX, Appendix E. Accordingly, having reviewed the petition,
IT IS ORDERED that the Petition for Consent Discipline be accepted. The name of Alton Bates, Louisiana Bar Roll number 17913, shall be stricken from the roll of attorneys and his license to practice law in the State of Louisiana shall be revoked. Pursuant to Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 24(A), it is further ordered that respondent be permanently prohibited from being readmitted to the practice of law in this state.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all costs and expenses in the matter are assessed against respondent in accordance with Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 10.1, with legal interest to commence thirty days from the date of finality of this court’s judgment until paid.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
26 So. 3d 746, 2010 La. LEXIS 102, 2010 WL 324418, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-bates-la-2010.