In re Bateman

625 A.2d 467, 132 N.J. 297, 1993 N.J. LEXIS 108
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedMay 28, 1993
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 625 A.2d 467 (In re Bateman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Bateman, 625 A.2d 467, 132 N.J. 297, 1993 N.J. LEXIS 108 (N.J. 1993).

Opinion

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed a report with the Supreme Court, recommending that MARC C. BATEMAN of OAKLAND, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1975, and who was thereafter temporarily suspended from the practice of law on April 12, 1990, and who remains suspended at this time, be suspended from practice for a period of two years, retroactive to April 12, 1990, for having been convicted of mail fraud conspiracy, in violation of 18 U.S.C.A. §§ 371 and 3623, and making a false statement on a loan application, in violation of 18 U.S.C.A. §§ 1014 and 2, respondent having assisted in obtaining an inflated appraisal value of a property, and that [298]*298conduct being in violation of DR 1-102(A)(3) and (4) and RPC 8.4(b) and (c);

And good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that the report and recommendation of the Disciplinary Review Board are adopted and MARC C. BATE-MAN is hereby suspended for a period of two years, retroactive to April 12, 1990, and until the further Order of the Court; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent shall be restrained and enjoined from practicing law during the period of his suspension and that he shall comply with Regulation 23 of the Administrative Guidelines Governing Suspended Attorneys; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent shall reimburse the Ethics Financial Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re Convery
765 A.2d 724 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 2001)
Matter of Greenberg
714 A.2d 243 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
625 A.2d 467, 132 N.J. 297, 1993 N.J. LEXIS 108, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-bateman-nj-1993.