In re Basir

691 F. App'x 906
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
DecidedMay 6, 2016
Docket2016-1724
StatusPublished

This text of 691 F. App'x 906 (In re Basir) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Basir, 691 F. App'x 906 (Fed. Cir. 2016).

Opinion

ORDER

Wallaeh, Circuit Judge.

The parties jointly move to remand the appeal to the Patent Trial and Appeal Board.

The parties note that they recently conferred and agree that the Board’s decision should be vacated and the case should be remanded for reconsideration of rejected claims 20, 23, 26, 32, 35, 37-39, 42, 44, 45, 47, 59, 63, and 64 of U.S. Patent Application 12/126,045. ’

It is well settled that an agency may request a remand in order to further consider its position. See SKF USA Inc. v. United States, 254 F.3d 1022, 1029 (Fed. Cir. 2001). It is further appropriate for a [907]*907court of review to grant such relief where, as here, remanding the case may ultimately prove useful in review of the matter or conserve judicial economy. Id.

Upon consideration thereof,

It Is Ordered That:

(1) The motion to remand is granted.

(2) Each side shall bear its own costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

SKF USA Inc. v. United States
254 F.3d 1022 (Federal Circuit, 2001)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
691 F. App'x 906, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-basir-cafc-2016.