In Re Barwick

Supreme Court of North Carolina

In Re Barwick

44 S.E.2d 599, 228 N.C. 113, 1947 N.C. LEXIS 557

DecidedOctober 29, 1947

StatusPublished

This text of 44 S.E.2d 599 (In Re Barwick) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In Re Barwick, 44 S.E.2d 599, 228 N.C. 113, 1947 N.C. LEXIS 557 (N.C. 1947).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The petition of Madeline Dunn Barwick for the custody of her infant son was beard upon return to the writ of habeas corpus issued under Gr. S., 17-39. Petitioner is separated from ber husband but not divorced. Barwick v. Barwick, ante, 109. After full bearing afforded to petitioner and respondent, and consideration of the supporting affidavits of each, judgment was rendered awarding custody of the child to the petitioner, the court finding “that the best interest and general welfare of said infant Carl Franklin Barwick require thaL its custody, care and control be awarded to its mother, Mrs. Madeline Dunn Barwick.” Provision was made for respondent father to have the child with him at certain times. Respondent appealed. His only exception “was to the signing and entering of judgment.” The facts found by the court below were sufficient to support the judgment.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The petition of Madeline Dunn Barwick for the custody of her infant son was beard upon return to the writ of habeas corpus issued under Gr. S., 17-39. Petitioner is separated from ber husband but not divorced. Barwick v. Barwick, ante, 109. After full bearing afforded to petitioner and respondent, and consideration of the supporting affidavits of each, judgment was rendered awarding custody of the child to the petitioner, the court finding “that the best interest and general welfare of said infant Carl Franklin Barwick require thaL its custody, care and control be awarded to its mother, Mrs. Madeline Dunn Barwick.” Provision was made for respondent father to have the child with him at certain times. Respondent appealed. His only exception “was to the signing and entering of judgment.” The facts found by the court below were sufficient to support the judgment.

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

44 S.E.2d 599, 228 N.C. 113, 1947 N.C. LEXIS 557, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-barwick-nc-1947.