In re Baruch

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Baruch

12 A.D.2d 622, 210 N.Y.S.2d 760, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6683

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 5, 1960

StatusPublished

This text of 12 A.D.2d 622 (In re Baruch) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Baruch, 12 A.D.2d 622, 210 N.Y.S.2d 760, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6683 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1960).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion to confirm the report of the Official Referee, recommending that respondent be censured, granted, except as to the degree of punishment recommended. In our opinion, the serious charges against respondent, having been established and admitted, necessitate more stringent disciplinary action than the censure recommended by the Referee. Accordingly, the respondent is suspended from the practice of law for a period of five years. Nolan, P. J., Kleinfeld, Christ, Pette and Brennan, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion to confirm the report of the Official Referee, recommending that respondent be censured, granted, except as to the degree of punishment recommended. In our opinion, the serious charges against respondent, having been established and admitted, necessitate more stringent disciplinary action than the censure recommended by the Referee. Accordingly, the respondent is suspended from the practice of law for a period of five years. Nolan, P. J., Kleinfeld, Christ, Pette and Brennan, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

12 A.D.2d 622, 210 N.Y.S.2d 760, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6683, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-baruch-nyappdiv-1960.