In re Bartone

CourtDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals
DecidedAugust 7, 2025
Docket25-BG-0697
StatusPublished

This text of In re Bartone (In re Bartone) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District of Columbia Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Bartone, (D.C. 2025).

Opinion

Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the Atlantic and Maryland Reporters. Users are requested to notify the Clerk of the Court of any formal errors so that corrections may be made before the bound volumes go to press.

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS

No. 25-BG-0697

IN RE DAVID J. BARTONE, ESQUIRE, Respondent. A Member of the Bar of the District of Columbia Court of Appeals DDNs: 2021-D163, et al. Bar Registration No. 411044 BDN: 25-PD-015

BEFORE: McLeese, Deahl, and Shanker, Associate Judges.

ORDER (FILED—August 7, 2025)

On consideration of the affidavit of respondent David J. Bartone, wherein he consents to disbarment from the Bar of the District of Columbia; the report and recommendation of the Board on Professional Responsibility; and the Board’s unopposed motion for leave to file under seal the Disciplinary Counsel’s lodged motion to accept respondent’s consent to disbarment, which includes as an attachment his affidavit consenting to disbarment; it is

ORDERED that respondent David J. Bartone is hereby disbarred by consent. See D.C. Bar R. XI, § 12(a). It is

FURTHER ORDERED that the Board’s motion to file under seal is granted, and the Clerk shall file the lodged documents under seal. See id. § 12(c). It is

FURTHER ORDERED that respondent’s attention is drawn to the requirements relating to disbarred attorneys, including the filing of the required affidavit, and to the provisions relating to eligibility for reinstatement. See id. §§ 14, 16. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall publish this order and transmit a copy thereof to respondent, Disciplinary Counsel, and the Chairperson of the Board.

PER CURIAM

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
In re Bartone, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-bartone-dc-2025.