In re Bartolotta

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Bartolotta

106 A.D.2d 175, 484 N.Y.S.2d 848, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 48395

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 4, 1985

StatusPublished

This text of 106 A.D.2d 175 (In re Bartolotta) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Bartolotta, 106 A.D.2d 175, 484 N.Y.S.2d 848, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 48395 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1985).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Per Curiam.

The respondent was admitted to practice by this court on September 7, 1977, under the name Paul Anthony Bartolotta. On November 1, 1984, respondent was found guilty, after a jury trial in the Supreme Court, Westchester County, of perjury in the first degree, a class D felony (see, Penal Law § 210.15). Pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90 (4), upon his conviction of a felony, the respondent ceased to be an attorney and counselor-at-law in this State. Accordingly, the petitioner’s motion is granted. Respondent is disbarred and the clerk of this court is directed to strike the respondent’s name from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law forthwith. Mollen, P.J., Titone, Lazer, Mangano and Gibbons, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION OF THE COURT

Per Curiam.

The respondent was admitted to practice by this court on September 7, 1977, under the name Paul Anthony Bartolotta. On November 1, 1984, respondent was found guilty, after a jury trial in the Supreme Court, Westchester County, of perjury in the first degree, a class D felony (see, Penal Law § 210.15). Pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90 (4), upon his conviction of a felony, the respondent ceased to be an attorney and counselor-at-law in this State. Accordingly, the petitioner’s motion is granted. Respondent is disbarred and the clerk of this court is directed to strike the respondent’s name from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law forthwith. Mollen, P.J., Titone, Lazer, Mangano and Gibbons, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

106 A.D.2d 175, 484 N.Y.S.2d 848, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 48395, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-bartolotta-nyappdiv-1985.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack