In re Bartlett-Svehla

Illinois Supreme Court

In re Bartlett-Svehla

197 Ill. 2d 589

CourtIllinois Supreme Court

DecidedNovember 15, 2001

DocketMR 17701

StatusPublished

This text of 197 Ill. 2d 589 (In re Bartlett-Svehla) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Illinois Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Bartlett-Svehla, 197 Ill. 2d 589 (Ill. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

Order of the Court:

The petition by the Administrator of the Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission to impose discipline on consent pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 762(b) is allowed. Respondent Dorothy E. BartlettSvehla is censured, and respondent is directed to complete the professionalism seminar conducted by the Illinois Professional Responsibility Institute and to attend a bar association or privately sponsored seminar or program on ethics at her own cost within six months of this order, or within such time as the Adminstrator and respondent may agree.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order of the Court:

The petition by the Administrator of the Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission to impose discipline on consent pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 762(b) is allowed. Respondent Dorothy E. BartlettSvehla is censured, and respondent is directed to complete the professionalism seminar conducted by the Illinois Professional Responsibility Institute and to attend a bar association or privately sponsored seminar or program on ethics at her own cost within six months of this order, or within such time as the Adminstrator and respondent may agree.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

197 Ill. 2d 589, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-bartlett-svehla-ill-2001.