In Re Barry Tarlow, on Petition for Habeas Corpus v. Honorable Manuel L. Real, United States District Judge

Ninth Circuit

In Re Barry Tarlow, on Petition for Habeas Corpus v. Honorable Manuel L. Real, United States District Judge

455 F.2d 1380, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 10584

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedMarch 22, 1972

Docket72-1492

StatusPublished

This text of 455 F.2d 1380 (In Re Barry Tarlow, on Petition for Habeas Corpus v. Honorable Manuel L. Real, United States District Judge) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In Re Barry Tarlow, on Petition for Habeas Corpus v. Honorable Manuel L. Real, United States District Judge, 455 F.2d 1380, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 10584 (9th Cir. 1972).

Pincite

Opinions

ORDER

The request for oral argument on the petition for habeas corpus is denied.

The petition for habeas corpus is denied.

In the interests of prompt resumption of trial it is suggested that the district court consider allowing petitioner, as an option to commitment, to withdraw his cross-examination based upon his investigator’s photographic display to the witnesses, such cross-examination to be stricken and the jury admonished to disregard it.

The application for stay of mandate is denied. Judge Hufstedler’s stay of the district court’s order of March 14, 1972, committing petitioner, is extended to and including Monday, March 27, 1972, to permit petitioner to apply to Circuit Justice William O. Douglas for a stay pending the filing of a petition for cer-tiorari.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

The request for oral argument on the petition for habeas corpus is denied.

The petition for habeas corpus is denied.

In the interests of prompt resumption of trial it is suggested that the district court consider allowing petitioner, as an option to commitment, to withdraw his cross-examination based upon his investigator’s photographic display to the witnesses, such cross-examination to be stricken and the jury admonished to disregard it.

The application for stay of mandate is denied. Judge Hufstedler’s stay of the district court’s order of March 14, 1972, committing petitioner, is extended to and including Monday, March 27, 1972, to permit petitioner to apply to Circuit Justice William O. Douglas for a stay pending the filing of a petition for cer-tiorari.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

455 F.2d 1380, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 10584, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-barry-tarlow-on-petition-for-habeas-corpus-v-honorable-manuel-l-ca9-1972.