in Re: Barry Eugene Brooks
This text of in Re: Barry Eugene Brooks (in Re: Barry Eugene Brooks) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NO. 12-07-00166-CR
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS
TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT
TYLER, TEXAS
§
IN RE: BARRY EUGENE BROOKS,
RELATOR § ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
MEMORANDUM OPINION
PER CURIAM
Barry Eugene Brooks filed an original application for writ of habeas corpus in this court alleging that he is illegally confined by James Campbell, Sheriff of Cherokee County, Texas, after being wrongfully convicted for the unlicensed practice of dentistry. See Tex. Occ. Code Ann. §§ 256.001, 264.151 (Vernon 2004). Texas courts of appeals have no original habeas corpus jurisdiction in criminal matters. Tex. Gov't Code Ann. § 22.221(d) (Vernon 2004); In re Adams, No. 12-03-00055-CV, 2003 WL 660850, at *1 (Tex. App.-Tyler 2003, orig. proceeding) (not designated for publication); Dodson v. State, 988 S.W.2d 833, 835 (Tex. App.-San Antonio 1999, no pet.). Their jurisdiction is appellate only. Dodson, 988 S.W.2d at 835. Therefore, we are without jurisdiction in this proceeding. Accordingly, Brooks’s application is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.
Opinion delivered June 6, 2007.
Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and Hoyle, J.
(DO NOT PUBLISH)
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re: Barry Eugene Brooks, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-barry-eugene-brooks-texapp-2007.