in Re: Barry Eugene Brooks

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJune 6, 2007
Docket12-07-00166-CR
StatusPublished

This text of in Re: Barry Eugene Brooks (in Re: Barry Eugene Brooks) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
in Re: Barry Eugene Brooks, (Tex. Ct. App. 2007).

Opinion

                NO. 12-07-00166-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

§         

IN RE: BARRY EUGENE BROOKS,

RELATOR    §          ORIGINAL PROCEEDING


MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM

            Barry Eugene Brooks filed an original application for writ of habeas corpus in this court alleging that he is illegally confined by James Campbell, Sheriff of Cherokee County, Texas, after being wrongfully convicted for the unlicensed practice of dentistry.  See Tex. Occ. Code Ann. §§ 256.001, 264.151 (Vernon 2004).  Texas courts of appeals have no original habeas corpus jurisdiction in criminal matters.  Tex. Gov't Code Ann. § 22.221(d) (Vernon 2004); In re Adams, No. 12-03-00055-CV, 2003 WL 660850, at *1 (Tex. App.-Tyler 2003, orig. proceeding) (not designated for publication); Dodson v. State, 988 S.W.2d 833, 835 (Tex. App.-San Antonio 1999, no pet.).  Their jurisdiction is appellate only.  Dodson, 988 S.W.2d at 835.  Therefore, we are without jurisdiction in this proceeding.  Accordingly, Brooks’s application is  dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

Opinion delivered June 6, 2007.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and Hoyle, J.

(DO NOT PUBLISH)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Dodson v. State
988 S.W.2d 833 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1999)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
in Re: Barry Eugene Brooks, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-barry-eugene-brooks-texapp-2007.