in Re Barry Dwayne Minnfee

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided October 23, 2008·No. 09-08-00375-CV·Published

Opinion

In The



Court of Appeals



Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

____________________



NO. 09-08-375 CV



IN RE BARRY DWAYNE MINNFEE

Original Proceeding


MEMORANDUM OPINION


Barry Dwayne Minnfee filed a petition for writ of mandamus through which he seeks to compel the trial court to grant permission for Minnfee to file a suit notwithstanding his status as a vexatious litigant. See Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code Ann. § 11.102 (Vernon 2002).

To obtain mandamus relief, a relator must show both that the trial court clearly abused its discretion and that the relator has no adequate remedy by appeal. In re Prudential Ins. Co. of Am., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135-36 (Tex. 2004). The relator has not established that the trial court abused its discretion in refusing to grant leave to file the petition submitted by Minnfee. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is denied.

PETITION DENIED.

PER CURIAM



Opinion Delivered October 23, 2008

Before McKeithen, C.J., Gaultney and Kreger, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

in Re Barry Dwayne Minnfee, (Tex. Ct. App. 2008).

in Re Barry Dwayne Minnfee (in Re Barry Dwayne Minnfee) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re Prudential Insurance Co. of America
148 S.W.3d 124 (Texas Supreme Court, 2004)