in Re barros/mceachern/sturman Minors
This text of in Re barros/mceachern/sturman Minors (in Re barros/mceachern/sturman Minors) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
October 30, 2015 Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice
Stephen J. Markman Brian K. Zahra 152405 Bridget M. McCormack David F. Viviano Richard H. Bernstein Joan L. Larsen, SC: 152405 Justices In re BARROS/McEACHERN/STURMAN, COA: 325753 Minors. Washtenaw CC Family Division: 13-000003-NA; 13-000004-NA; 13-000005-NA
_______________________________________/
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the September 8, 2015 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. October 30, 2015 s1027 Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re barros/mceachern/sturman Minors, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-barrosmceachernsturman-minors-mich-2015.