In re Barrett

27 A.D.3d 979, 811 N.Y.S.2d 220

This text of 27 A.D.3d 979 (In re Barrett) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Barrett, 27 A.D.3d 979, 811 N.Y.S.2d 220 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2006).

Opinion

Lahtinen, J.

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed August 27, 2004, which ruled, inter alia, that claimant was ineligible to receive unemployment insurance benefits because he was not totally unemployed.

The decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board finding claimant ineligible to receive benefits during his benefit period because he was not totally unemployed is supported by substantial evidence. The record establishes that claimant was involved as a member of a band that practiced regularly and professionally recorded a compact disc to distribute to numerous local record companies in an effort to obtain a record contract or performance booking (see Matter of Eisenstadt [Commissioner of Labor], 300 AD2d 729, 730 [2002]). The record also establishes that claimant was not totally unemployed when he was paid by a friend for removing a tree from her yard. As such, the Board’s decision is affirmed.

Spain, J.P., Carpinello, Mugglin and Rose, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re the Claim of Eisenstadt
300 A.D.2d 729 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
27 A.D.3d 979, 811 N.Y.S.2d 220, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-barrett-nyappdiv-2006.