In re Barrett

196 A.D.2d 58, 609 N.Y.S.2d 889, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2239

This text of 196 A.D.2d 58 (In re Barrett) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Barrett, 196 A.D.2d 58, 609 N.Y.S.2d 889, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2239 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Per Curiam.

The above-named attorney was admitted to practice by this Court on October 26, 1953 and is currently in good standing. He has submitted an affidavit requesting that this Court accept his resignation from the practice of law in New York State. His affidavit states that he has relocated to the State of California. There are no complaints pending against him either in New York State or in California.

[59]*59We grant the application and direct that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys.

Denman, P. J., Green, Pine, Balio and Lawton, JJ., concur.

Resignation accepted, and name stricken from roll of attorneys.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
196 A.D.2d 58, 609 N.Y.S.2d 889, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2239, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-barrett-nyappdiv-1994.