Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/In re Barrett

In re Barrett

196 A.D.2d 58, 609 N.Y.S.2d 889, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2239
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in In re Barrett. Read the opinion of the Court — 214 A.D.2d 231 →
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 4, 1994·Published

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Per Curiam.

The above-named attorney was admitted to practice by this Court on October 26, 1953 and is currently in good standing. He has submitted an affidavit requesting that this Court accept his resignation from the practice of law in New York State. His affidavit states that he has relocated to the State of California. There are no complaints pending against him either in New York State or in California.

[59]*59We grant the application and direct that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys.

Denman, P. J., Green, Pine, Balio and Lawton, JJ., concur.

Resignation accepted, and name stricken from roll of attorneys.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Barrett, 196 A.D.2d 58, 609 N.Y.S.2d 889, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2239 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

196 A.D.2d 58 (In re Barrett) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.