In re Barratt

Indiana Supreme Court

In re Barratt

693 N.E.2d 530, 1998 Ind. LEXIS 32, 1998 WL 156760

Indiana Supreme Court·Decided March 25, 1998·No. No. 49S00-9406-DI-575·Published

Opinion

ORDER GRANTING REINSTATEMENT

Comes now the Indiana Supreme Court Disciplinary Commission and recommends that the petitioner, J. Scott Barratt, be reinstated to the practice of law in this state.

And this Court, being duly advised, now finds that the recommendation of the Disciplinary Commission should be followed and that, accordingly, the petitioner should be reinstated to the practice of law in this state.

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the petition for reinstatement of petitioner J. Scott Barratt is hereby granted. Accordingly, the petitioner is reinstated as a member of the bar of this state.

All Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER GRANTING REINSTATEMENT

Comes now the Indiana Supreme Court Disciplinary Commission and recommends that the petitioner, J. Scott Barratt, be reinstated to the practice of law in this state.

And this Court, being duly advised, now finds that the recommendation of the Disciplinary Commission should be followed and that, accordingly, the petitioner should be reinstated to the practice of law in this state.

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the petition for reinstatement of petitioner J. Scott Barratt is hereby granted. Accordingly, the petitioner is reinstated as a member of the bar of this state.

All Justices concur.

In re Barratt, 693 N.E.2d 530, 1998 Ind. LEXIS 32, 1998 WL 156760 (Ind. 1998).

Pincite

693 N.E.2d 530 (In re Barratt) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.