In re Baron

Supreme Court of New Jersey

In re Baron

603 A.2d 29, 127 N.J. 151, 1992 N.J. LEXIS 1311

DecidedMarch 18, 1992

StatusPublished

This text of 603 A.2d 29 (In re Baron) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Baron, 603 A.2d 29, 127 N.J. 151, 1992 N.J. LEXIS 1311 (N.J. 1992).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

THIS MATTER, having been opened to the Court by DAVID E. JOHNSON, JR., Director, Office of Attorney Ethics, and with the consent of the respondent, Robert A. Baron, of Englewood, and respondent’s counsel, John J. Sheehy, and it appearing that the Office of Attorney Ethics and Respondent having agreed that respondent is presently unable to engage in the practice of law and should be transferred to “disability inactive” status in accordance with R.l:20-9(b).

IT IS ORDERED that:

1. Pursuant to R.l:20-9(b) Robert A. Baron of Englewood, admitted to practice in this state in 1962, is hereby transferred to “disability inactive” status, effective immediately, and until further Order of the Court.

2. Robert A. Baron is hereby restrained and enjoined from practicing law during the period that he remains on “disability inactive” status.

3. Robert A. Baron shall, pursuant to R.l:20-9(e), comply with Administrative Guideline 23 of the Office of Attorney Ethics governing incapacitated attorneys.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI