In re Barnett
This text of 52 How. Pr. 73 (In re Barnett) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
There seems to have been some conflict as to what is a special proceeding (27 N. Y., 629; 20 How., 304; 4 Keys, 66).
[75]*75But none of the cases doubt that where the matter is in court, and not merely before a judicial officer out of court, section 3 of the Code applies. The present proceeding was in the court." The writ was returnable thereto, and the final judgment was at special term. Under these circumstances 55 N. Y., is applicable, and the taxation must be affirmed.
Taxation affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
52 How. Pr. 73, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-barnett-nysupct-1876.