In re Barnes

561 F. App'x 278
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 24, 2014·No. No. 14-1159·Published

Opinion

Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Jamal Barnes petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his pending 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. Our review of the district court’s docket reveals that there is no pending § 2255 motion. Accordingly, we conclude that there has been no undue delay in the district court, and we deny the mandamus petition. We grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis. We dispense [279] with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Barnes, 561 F. App'x 278 (4th Cir. 2014).

561 F. App'x 278 (In re Barnes) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related