in Re: Barnabas Madu
This text of in Re: Barnabas Madu (in Re: Barnabas Madu) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed March 1, 2005.
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals
____________
NO. 14-05-00171-CV
IN RE BARNABAS MADU, Relator
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
WRIT OF MANDAMUS
WRIT OF INJUNCTION
WRIT OF PROHIBITION
M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N
On February 22, 2005, relator, Barnabas Madu, filed a petition for writ of mandamus, writ of injunction, and writ of prohibition in this court. See Tex. Gov't Code Ann. ' 22.221 (Vernon Supp. 2004). Relator asks this court to order the Honorable James York, Judge of the 246th Judicial District Court of Harris County, Texas, to set aside his order signed December 29, 2004, entered in trial court cause number 2004-64720, styled In the Matter of the Marriage of Clara Osuji Madu and Barnabas Madu. Relator claims that the order is void because the trial court improperly exercised jurisdiction over a suit affecting the parent-child relationship. Relator also filed a motion for an emergency stay and immediate temporary relief. See Tex. R. App. p. 52.8(b), 52.10.
Relator has not established that he is entitled to extraordinary relief. Accordingly, we deny relator=s petition for writ of mandamus, writ of injunction, and writ of prohibition. We also deny relator=s motion for emergency stay and temporary relief.
PER CURIAM
Petition Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed March 1, 2005.
Panel consists of Justices Edelman, Seymore and Guzman.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re: Barnabas Madu, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-barnabas-madu-texapp-2005.