In re: Barjaktarovic
This text of In re: Barjaktarovic (In re: Barjaktarovic) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCPW-XX-XXXXXXX 02-JUN-2026 01:06 PM Dkt. 66 ORD
SCPW-XX-XXXXXXX
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAIʻI
IN THE MATTER OF MILICA BARJAKTAROVIC
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING (CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX; CASE NO. 1CCV-XX-XXXXXXX)
ORDER (By: Devens, C.J., McKenna and Eddins, JJ., Circuit Judge Souza, in place of Ginoza, J., recused, and Circuit Judge Malinao, assigned by reason of vacancy)
Before this court is Petitioner’s petition for writ of
mandamus, filed July 22, 2025, and Petitioner’s motion for leave
to proceed in forma pauperis, filed July 22, 2025.
Petitioner has not demonstrated a clear and indisputable
right to relief. See Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP v. Kim, 153
Hawaiʻi 307, 319, 537 P.3d 1154, 1166 (2023).
It is ordered:
1. The petition for writ of mandamus is denied;
2. The filing fee is waived; 3. Petitioner’s motions filed at docket numbers 9, 13,
19, 23, 28, 35, 40, 44, 52, 55, 60, and 62 are denied as moot.
4. The appellate clerk shall not accept any further
filings from Petitioner in this case effective June 15, 2026.
DATED: Honolulu, Hawaiʻi, June 2, 2026.
/s/ Vladimir P. Devens
/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna
/s/ Todd W. Eddins
/s/ Kevin A.K. Souza
/s/ Clarissa Y. Malinao
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
In re: Barjaktarovic, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-barjaktarovic-haw-2026.