In re Barish
880 A.2d 1232
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided August 25, 2005·No. No. 221 Disciplinary Docket No. 3·Published
Opinion
ORDER
AND NOW, this 25th day of August, 2005, upon consideration of the Report and Recommendations of the Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania dated June 10, 2005, the Petition for Reinstatement is granted.
Pursuant to Rule 218(e), Pa.R.D.E., petitioner is directed to pay the expenses incurred by the Board in the investigation and processing of the Petition for Reinstatement.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In re Barish, 880 A.2d 1232 (Pa. 2005).
880 A.2d 1232 (In re Barish) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.