In re Barclays Bank

96 A.D.2d 594, 464 N.Y.S.2d 1016, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 19125
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided July 25, 1983·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

— In a proceeding to cancel and expunge of record a mortgage satisfaction erroneously made and recorded, petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Gowan, J.), dated December 20, 1982, which denied the application. Judgment reversed, on the law, without costs or disbursements, application granted and mortgage satisfaction canceled and expunged. Petitioner’s application to cancel and expunge the mortgage satisfaction at issue was unopposed. It is uncontroverted that the satisfaction was recorded by mistake, and Special Term so found. The mistake should therefore be rectified (Lumber Exch. Bank v Miller, 18 Mise 127; Krause v Hullar, 135 Mise 837). Gibbons, J. P., Thompson, Gulotta and Boyers, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Barclays Bank, 96 A.D.2d 594, 464 N.Y.S.2d 1016, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 19125 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1983).

96 A.D.2d 594 (In re Barclays Bank) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Joazard v. Joazard
83 A.D.3d 664 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)
Beneficial Mortgage Corp. v. Lawrence
5 A.D.3d 339 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)