In re Barbosa

Supreme Court of North Carolina

In re Barbosa

580 S.E.2d 359, 357 N.C. 160

CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina

DecidedMay 1, 2003

DocketNo. 141P03

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 580 S.E.2d 359 (In re Barbosa) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Barbosa, 580 S.E.2d 359, 357 N.C. 160 (N.C. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

Respondent’s notice of appeal and petition for discretionary review have been treated as a writ of certiorari and as such respondent’s petition for writ of certiorari is allowed for the limited purpose of remanding this case to the North Carolina Court of Appeals, for reconsideration of its order dismissing respondent’s appeal as moot, in light of this Court’s decision in In re Hatley, 291 N.C. 693, 694-95, 231 S.E.2d 633, 634-35 (1977).

By order of the Court in Conference, this 1st day of May 2003.

Brady, J. For the Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

Respondent’s notice of appeal and petition for discretionary review have been treated as a writ of certiorari and as such respondent’s petition for writ of certiorari is allowed for the limited purpose of remanding this case to the North Carolina Court of Appeals, for reconsideration of its order dismissing respondent’s appeal as moot, in light of this Court’s decision in In re Hatley, 291 N.C. 693, 694-95, 231 S.E.2d 633, 634-35 (1977).

By order of the Court in Conference, this 1st day of May 2003.

Brady, J. For the Court

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

580 S.E.2d 359, 357 N.C. 160, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-barbosa-nc-2003.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack