in Re Barbara J. Stanfield, Individually, as a Direct-Action and Derivatively on Behalf of Intervenor TIG Transportation, LLC

Court of Appeals of Texas

in Re Barbara J. Stanfield, Individually, as a Direct-Action and Derivatively on Behalf of Intervenor TIG Transportation, LLC

DecidedDecember 2, 2021

Docket01-21-00674-CV

StatusPublished

This text of in Re Barbara J. Stanfield, Individually, as a Direct-Action and Derivatively on Behalf of Intervenor TIG Transportation, LLC (in Re Barbara J. Stanfield, Individually, as a Direct-Action and Derivatively on Behalf of Intervenor TIG Transportation, LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

in Re Barbara J. Stanfield, Individually, as a Direct-Action and Derivatively on Behalf of Intervenor TIG Transportation, LLC, (Tex. Ct. App. 2021).

Pincite

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: In re Barbara J. Stanfield, Individually, as a Direct-Action Plaintiff, and Derivatively on behalf of Intervenor TIG Transportation, LLC

Appellate case number: 01-21-00674-CV

Trial court case number: 2021-20472

Trial court: 215th District Court of Harris County

Relator has filed a petition for writ of mandamus challenging the trial court’s September 20, 2021 order granting the motion to show authority filed by real party in interest, and three November 17, 2021 orders granting real party’s motion to strike pleadings due to lack of authority, as well as his requests for issuance of back pay and for payment of past attorney’s fees and expenses. Relator has also filed a motion for emergency relief, asking that we stay trial court proceedings and related appellate proceedings in appellate cause number 01-21-00591-CV, styled Timothy Cannon, Jr. and TIG Transportation, LLC v. Barbara J. Stanfield, et al. Relator’s request for a stay of trial court and appellate proceedings in appellate cause number 01-21-00591-CV is granted. The stay is effective until disposition of relator’s petition for writ of mandamus or until further orders of this Court. The Court requests a response to the petition for writ of mandamus from the real party in interest. The response, if any, is due to be filed no later than 20 days from the date of this order. It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: ____/s/ Peter Kelly______  Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: ___December 2, 2021____

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: In re Barbara J. Stanfield, Individually, as a Direct-Action Plaintiff, and Derivatively on behalf of Intervenor TIG Transportation, LLC

Appellate case number: 01-21-00674-CV

Trial court case number: 2021-20472

Trial court: 215th District Court of Harris County

Relator has filed a petition for writ of mandamus challenging the trial court’s September 20, 2021 order granting the motion to show authority filed by real party in interest, and three November 17, 2021 orders granting real party’s motion to strike pleadings due to lack of authority, as well as his requests for issuance of back pay and for payment of past attorney’s fees and expenses. Relator has also filed a motion for emergency relief, asking that we stay trial court proceedings and related appellate proceedings in appellate cause number 01-21-00591-CV, styled Timothy Cannon, Jr. and TIG Transportation, LLC v. Barbara J. Stanfield, et al. Relator’s request for a stay of trial court and appellate proceedings in appellate cause number 01-21-00591-CV is granted. The stay is effective until disposition of relator’s petition for writ of mandamus or until further orders of this Court. The Court requests a response to the petition for writ of mandamus from the real party in interest. The response, if any, is due to be filed no later than 20 days from the date of this order. It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: ____/s/ Peter Kelly______  Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: ___December 2, 2021____

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

in Re Barbara J. Stanfield, Individually, as a Direct-Action and Derivatively on Behalf of Intervenor TIG Transportation, LLC, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-barbara-j-stanfield-individually-as-a-direct-action-and-texapp-2021.