In Re Bankers Life & Casualty Co.

Fifth Circuit

In Re Bankers Life & Casualty Co.

199 F.2d 593

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedDecember 12, 1952

Docket14222

StatusPublished

Cited by8 cases

This text of 199 F.2d 593 (In Re Bankers Life & Casualty Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In Re Bankers Life & Casualty Co., 199 F.2d 593 (5th Cir. 1952).

Pincite

Opinion

*594 PER CURIAM.

Upon full consideration of the briefs and arguments on the motion to dismiss, the court is of the opinion that no fact or reason is stated showing that the relief by mandamus is an appropriate remedy. Without, therefore, determining, or considering on the merits, whether the order complained of was rightly entered, the motion to dismiss the petition, because the relief prayed for is not appropriate, is granted, and the petition is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*594 PER CURIAM.

Upon full consideration of the briefs and arguments on the motion to dismiss, the court is of the opinion that no fact or reason is stated showing that the relief by mandamus is an appropriate remedy. Without, therefore, determining, or considering on the merits, whether the order complained of was rightly entered, the motion to dismiss the petition, because the relief prayed for is not appropriate, is granted, and the petition is dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

199 F.2d 593, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-bankers-life-casualty-co-ca5-1952.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack