In Re Bankers Life & Casualty Co.
199 F.2d 593
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided December 12, 1952·No. 14222·Published·Cited by 8 cases
Opinion
Upon full consideration of the briefs and arguments on the motion to dismiss, the court is of the opinion that no fact or reason is stated showing that the relief by mandamus is an appropriate remedy. Without, therefore, determining, or considering on the merits, whether the order complained of was rightly entered, the motion to dismiss the petition, because the relief prayed for is not appropriate, is granted, and the petition is dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In Re Bankers Life & Casualty Co., 199 F.2d 593 (5th Cir. 1952).
199 F.2d 593 (In Re Bankers Life & Casualty Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Metropolitan Sanitary District of Greater Chicago v. General Electric Co.
208 F. Supp. 943 (N.D. Illinois, 1962)
Herbert Harrison Loum v. Honorable Mell G. Underwood, Chief Judge of the United States District Court, Eastern Division, Southern District of Ohio
262 F.2d 866 (Sixth Circuit, 1959)
Willie Hullom v. W. Wallace Kent, District Judge
262 F.2d 862 (Sixth Circuit, 1959)
In Re Turpentine & Rosin Factors, Inc., Pine Tree Products and P. J. Rooney, Praying for a Writ of Mandamus
238 F.2d 458 (Fifth Circuit, 1956)
Comfort Equipment Co. v. Steckler. Burch Mfg. Co., Inc. v. Steckler
212 F.2d 371 (Seventh Circuit, 1954)
Bankers Life & Casualty Co. v. Holland
346 U.S. 379 (Supreme Court, 1953)