in Re: Bank of America, N.A.

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedSeptember 14, 2011
Docket08-11-00269-CV
StatusPublished

This text of in Re: Bank of America, N.A. (in Re: Bank of America, N.A.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
in Re: Bank of America, N.A., (Tex. Ct. App. 2011).

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS

§ IN RE § No. 08-11-00269-CV

BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., § AN ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

§ IN MANDAMUS RELATOR. §

MEMORANDUM OPINION ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS

Relator asks this Court to issue a writ of mandamus against the Honorable Patrick Garcia,

Judge of the 384th District Court of El Paso County. To be entitled to mandamus relief, a relator

must meet two requirements. First, the relator must show that the trial court clearly abused its

discretion. In re Prudential Ins. Co. of Am., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135 (Tex. 2004). Second, the

relator must demonstrate that there is no adequate remedy by appeal. Id. at 135-36. Based on the

petition and on the record before us, we conclude that Relator has not demonstrated its

entitlement to mandamus relief. Accordingly, the petition is denied. See TEX .R.APP .P. 52.8(a).

September 14, 2011 DAVID WELLINGTON CHEW, Chief Justice

Before Chew, C.J., McClure, and Rivera, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re Prudential Insurance Co. of America
148 S.W.3d 124 (Texas Supreme Court, 2004)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
in Re: Bank of America, N.A., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-bank-of-america-na-texapp-2011.