In re Bangiyev

Fourth Circuit

In re Bangiyev

677 F. App'x 105

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 21, 2017·No. No. 16-2438·Published

Opinion

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Arkadiy Bangiyev petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging that the district court has unduly delayed in ruling on his motion requesting that certain evidence be produced related to his pending 28 U.S.C. § 2256 (2012) motion. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. We find the present record does not reveal undue delay in the district court. Accordingly, we deny the mandamus petition and the corrected mandamus petition. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Arkadiy Bangiyev petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging that the district court has unduly delayed in ruling on his motion requesting that certain evidence be produced related to his pending 28 U.S.C. § 2256 (2012) motion. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. We find the present record does not reveal undue delay in the district court. Accordingly, we deny the mandamus petition and the corrected mandamus petition. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED

In re Bangiyev, 677 F. App'x 105 (4th Cir. 2017).

Pincite

677 F. App'x 105 (In re Bangiyev) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related