In re Baldwin
This text of 271 S.E.2d 626 (In re Baldwin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The State Disciplinary Board found that respondent, B. H. Baldwin, violated standards 61 and 63 of State Bar of Georgia Rule 4-102 by failing to notify his client promptly of the receipt of funds from a real estate sale, failing to deliver such funds promptly to his client, and failing to render promptly to his client an appropriate accounting. The evidence shows respondent received $11,075 on or about January 12,1978, from the sale of real estate belonging to his client. Respondent deposited said funds in his trust account. On January 17,1978, he disbursed three checks in the amount of $239.70 for tax, survey and recording costs. On January 19, 1978, he paid himself a $4,000 fee. He did not notify his client of the receipt of the sales proceeds until May 24, 1978, when he sent her a check for $6,782.80. The client’s check was returned for insufficient funds. The funds were paid to the client four days thereafter and the client has suffered no financial loss.
The State Disciplinary Board reports and recommends an indefinite suspension of respondent’s license to practice law. Respondent has not filed an answer in this court. Upon review we find the report of the State Disciplinary Board to be supported by the record beyond a reasonable doubt.
It is ordered that B. H. Baldwin be suspended indefinitely from the practice of law in Georgia and from the State Bar of Georgia.
It is so ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
271 S.E.2d 626, 246 Ga. 344, 1980 Ga. LEXIS 1133, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-baldwin-ga-1980.