In re Bakewell
2 F. Cas. 500, 4 Nat. Bank. Reg. 619, 1871 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 110
This text of 2 F. Cas. 500 (In re Bakewell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Circuit Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
In re Bakewell, 2 F. Cas. 500, 4 Nat. Bank. Reg. 619, 1871 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 110 (uscirct 1871).
Opinion
After a careful consideration of the opinion in Re Darby, [supra,] I am constrained to differ with my Brother TREAT, of the eastern district of Missouri.
To properly construe the 43d section, we must take the whole act together, and in doing so I can arrive at no other conclusion than that presented in the decision of Mr. Register Harper, which is hereby affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Lazear v. Porter
87 Pa. 513 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1879)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
2 F. Cas. 500, 4 Nat. Bank. Reg. 619, 1871 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 110, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-bakewell-uscirct-1871.