In re Bakewell

2 F. Cas. 500, 4 Nat. Bank. Reg. 619, 1871 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 110
United States Circuit Court·Decided February 15, 1871·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

M’CANDLESS, District Judge.

After a careful consideration of the opinion in Re Darby, [supra,] I am constrained to differ with my Brother TREAT, of the eastern district of Missouri.

To properly construe the 43d section, we must take the whole act together, and in doing so I can arrive at no other conclusion than that presented in the decision of Mr. Register Harper, which is hereby affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Bakewell, 2 F. Cas. 500, 4 Nat. Bank. Reg. 619, 1871 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 110 (uscirct 1871).

2 F. Cas. 500 (In re Bakewell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lazear v. Porter
87 Pa. 513 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1879)