In re Baker

D. Massachusetts

In re Baker

212 F. 765, 1913 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 989

District Court, D. Massachusetts·Decided July 28, 1913·No. No. 17,572·Published

Opinion

MORTON, District Judge.

Whether a master, to whom a matter is referred to find the facts, should state his conclusions upon the case, is a question upon which, in the superior court at least, there has been a difference of opinion among the judges. It seems to me proper and' helpful for the master to do so; and I understand this to be the usual practice in all bankruptcy matters referred to referees.

Motion to strike out denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MORTON, District Judge.

Whether a master, to whom a matter is referred to find the facts, should state his conclusions upon the case, is a question upon which, in the superior court at least, there has been a difference of opinion among the judges. It seems to me proper and' helpful for the master to do so; and I understand this to be the usual practice in all bankruptcy matters referred to referees.

Motion to strike out denied.

In re Baker, 212 F. 765, 1913 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 989 (D. Mass. 1913).

Pincite

212 F. 765 (In re Baker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.