In re Bajaj

279 A.D.2d 439, 721 N.Y.S.2d 225, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1024

This text of 279 A.D.2d 439 (In re Bajaj) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Bajaj, 279 A.D.2d 439, 721 N.Y.S.2d 225, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1024 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

Opinion

Motion granted and this Court’s order entered on June 14, 1994 (212 AD2d 174) and the Opinion Per Curiam issued therewith vacated and petitioner reinstated as an attorney and counselor-at-law in the State of New York, effective the date hereof. No opinion. Concur — Rosenberger, J. P., Nardelli, Tom, Mazzarelli and Andrias, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re Bajaj
212 A.D.2d 174 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
279 A.D.2d 439, 721 N.Y.S.2d 225, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1024, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-bajaj-nyappdiv-2001.