In re Bajaj
279 A.D.2d 439, 721 N.Y.S.2d 225, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1024
Opinion
Motion granted and this Court’s order entered on June 14, 1994 (212 AD2d 174) and the Opinion Per Curiam issued therewith vacated and petitioner reinstated as an attorney and counselor-at-law in the State of New York, effective the date hereof. No opinion. Concur — Rosenberger, J. P., Nardelli, Tom, Mazzarelli and Andrias, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In re Bajaj, 279 A.D.2d 439, 721 N.Y.S.2d 225, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1024 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).
279 A.D.2d 439 (In re Bajaj) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In re Bajaj
212 A.D.2d 174 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)