In re Baisden

Supreme Court of Georgia

In re Baisden

444 S.E.2d 326, 264 Ga. 176, 94 Fulton County D. Rep. 1611, 1994 Ga. LEXIS 411

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedMay 9, 1994

DocketS94Y0247

StatusPublished

This text of 444 S.E.2d 326 (In re Baisden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Baisden, 444 S.E.2d 326, 264 Ga. 176, 94 Fulton County D. Rep. 1611, 1994 Ga. LEXIS 411 (Ga. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

Per curiam.

On March 17, 1994, this court entered an order finding that Tyson E. Baisden, Jr. violated Standard 65 of the Rules and Regulations of the State Bar of Georgia and, accepting mitigating circumstances found by the special master, ordered, among other things, a review panel reprimand and the payment of certain monies to the complainant through the Office of General Counsel. The order further provided that should he fail to pay the sum due within 30 days, he would be suspended from the practice of law.

Baisden has failed to comply with this court’s March 17, 1994 order and is, therefore, suspended from the practice of law until further order of this court. At such time as he fully complies with the March 17, 1994 order and pays the sum due, he may file a petition with the court certifying that the monies have been delivered to the Office of General Counsel and the court will consider terminating the suspension.

All the Justices concur; Hunt, C. J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per curiam.

On March 17, 1994, this court entered an order finding that Tyson E. Baisden, Jr. violated Standard 65 of the Rules and Regulations of the State Bar of Georgia and, accepting mitigating circumstances found by the special master, ordered, among other things, a review panel reprimand and the payment of certain monies to the complainant through the Office of General Counsel. The order further provided that should he fail to pay the sum due within 30 days, he would be suspended from the practice of law.

Baisden has failed to comply with this court’s March 17, 1994 order and is, therefore, suspended from the practice of law until further order of this court. At such time as he fully complies with the March 17, 1994 order and pays the sum due, he may file a petition with the court certifying that the monies have been delivered to the Office of General Counsel and the court will consider terminating the suspension.

All the Justices concur; Hunt, C. J., not participating.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

444 S.E.2d 326, 264 Ga. 176, 94 Fulton County D. Rep. 1611, 1994 Ga. LEXIS 411, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-baisden-ga-1994.