In Re Bailey

542 U.S. 902, 124 S. Ct. 2866
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided June 14, 2004·No. 03-10478·Published

Opinion

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and petition for writ of habeas corpus dismissed. See this Court’s Rule 39.8. As petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court’s process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with Rule *903 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U. S. 1 (1992) (per curiam).

Justice Stevens dissents.

See id., at 4, and cases cited therein.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Re Bailey, 542 U.S. 902, 124 S. Ct. 2866 (2004).

542 U.S. 902 (In Re Bailey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals
506 U.S. 1 (Supreme Court, 1992)