In re Bailey

Supreme Court of New Jersey

In re Bailey

188 A.3d 331, 234 N.J. 79

CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey

DecidedJuly 9, 2018

DocketD–62 September Term 2017; 080525

StatusPublished

This text of 188 A.3d 331 (In re Bailey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Bailey, 188 A.3d 331, 234 N.J. 79 (N.J. 2018).

Pincite

Opinion

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 17-234, concluding on the record certified to the Board pursuant to Rule 1:20-4(f)(default by respondent), that ERIC B. BAILEY , formerly of SPRINGFIELD , who was admitted to the bar of this State in 2006, and who has been placed on disability inactive status since November 12, 2015, should be censured for violating RPC 1.1(a) (gross neglect), RPC 1.3 (lack of diligence), RPC 1.4(b) (failure to communicate with client), RPC 3.2 (failure to expedite litigation), RPC 8.1(b) (failure to cooperate with disciplinary authorities), and RPC 8.4(c) (conduct involving **80dishonesty, fraud, deceit, or misrepresentation), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that ERIC B. BAILEY is hereby censured; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent's file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 17-234, concluding on the record certified to the Board pursuant to Rule 1:20-4(f)(default by respondent), that ERIC B. BAILEY , formerly of SPRINGFIELD , who was admitted to the bar of this State in 2006, and who has been placed on disability inactive status since November 12, 2015, should be censured for violating RPC 1.1(a) (gross neglect), RPC 1.3 (lack of diligence), RPC 1.4(b) (failure to communicate with client), RPC 3.2 (failure to expedite litigation), RPC 8.1(b) (failure to cooperate with disciplinary authorities), and RPC 8.4(c) (conduct involving **80dishonesty, fraud, deceit, or misrepresentation), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that ERIC B. BAILEY is hereby censured; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent's file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

188 A.3d 331, 234 N.J. 79, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-bailey-nj-2018.