In re Bailey

Supreme Court of New Jersey

In re Bailey

128 A.3d 1114, 224 N.J. 100, 2016 N.J. LEXIS 55

DecidedJanuary 27, 2016

StatusPublished

This text of 128 A.3d 1114 (In re Bailey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Bailey, 128 A.3d 1114, 224 N.J. 100, 2016 N.J. LEXIS 55 (N.J. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 15-133, concluding on the record certified to the Board pursuant to Rule l:2(M(f) (default by respondent), that ERIC B. BAILEY of SPRINGFIELD, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 2006, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 1.3 (lack of diligence), RPC 1.4(b) (failure to communicate with the client), and RPC 8.1(b) (failure to cooperate with disciplinary authorities), and good cause appearing;

[101]*101It is ORDERED that ERIC B. BAILEY is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 15-133, concluding on the record certified to the Board pursuant to Rule l:2(M(f) (default by respondent), that ERIC B. BAILEY of SPRINGFIELD, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 2006, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 1.3 (lack of diligence), RPC 1.4(b) (failure to communicate with the client), and RPC 8.1(b) (failure to cooperate with disciplinary authorities), and good cause appearing;

[101]*101It is ORDERED that ERIC B. BAILEY is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

128 A.3d 1114, 224 N.J. 100, 2016 N.J. LEXIS 55, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-bailey-nj-2016.