In re Bailey
512 S.E.2d 425, 350 N.C. 301, 1999 N.C. LEXIS 236
Opinion
As to the issue on direct appeal based on the dissenting opinion of Lewis, J., we affirm the decision of the Court of Appeals. We conclude the petition for discretionary review as to an additional issue was improvidently allowed.
AFFIRMED IN PART; DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IMPROVIDENTLY ALLOWED IN PART.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In re Bailey, 512 S.E.2d 425, 350 N.C. 301, 1999 N.C. LEXIS 236 (N.C. 1999).
512 S.E.2d 425 (In re Bailey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.